RF24-105は105mmの中望遠までの焦点距離で強烈な手ブレ補正が魅力的ですしEF24-70 は手ブレ補正はありませんが大口径でf2.の8明るさが魅力的です。 使用目的はスナップはもちろんのこと作品撮りみたいな撮影にも使用できればと思っています。

Rech­te obe­re Ecke mit Objek­tiv­kor­rek­tu­ren in Ligh­t­room, 200%, f/11. Ins­ge­samt ist bei der kür­zes­ten Brenn­wei­te von 24mm mein adap­tier­tes EF 24-70 f/2.8L II aber doch in allen Berei­chen und bei allen Blen­den­öff­nun­gen schär­fer und kon­trast­rei­cher, als mein RF 24-105 f/4L IS.

May 5, 2021. A lot of reviews about both lenses (also in direct comparison) can be found on review sites and youtube. Quite often the 24-105mm is described as a 24-70mm with shorter reach but with similar performance , maybe slightly less sharp.

Walk around 24-105 rf is way better than the one it replaces and demonstrably better. I also have the 35mm rf which is the new nifty fifty, light and efficient, macros or whatever. 50mm 1.2 rf, my Canon EF 24-70mm F/4L IS USM. vs. Canon EF-S 17-55 F/2.8 IS USM Canon EF 24-70mm F/4L IS USM. vs. Sony E PZ 18-105 mm F4 G OSS Canon EF 24-70mm F/4L IS USM Also, the 24-70 2.8 is about half the price of the RF 24-105L. Just due to 1.6x crop, I do think that something 16-35 might be something nice to think about. If you are leaning towards the 24-105L… maybe you might consider getting two lenses instead: 24-70 2.8 ($550) + Tokina Opera 16-28 2.8 ($400). EV1h. 470 288 125 203 186 334 311 81 330

canon rf 24 105 f4 vs ef 24 70 f2 8